Criteria for development levels of students’ compositional thinking when solving educational and creative problems during painting classes
https://doi.org/10.18522/2658-6983-2024-4-20-26
Abstract
The article is devoted to development of assessment criteria for both educational and creative works of art created by adult students during painting classes as well as finding out levels of their compositional thinking development. According to the authors, the problem under study has not been sufficiently resolved and requires in-depth research. The degree of complexity of solving educational and creative problems in painting classes when teaching adults is mentioned. The authors define scientific concepts “criterion” and “compositional thinking” and describe criteria for assessing quality of compositional thinking when doing pictorial educational and creative tasks, classified into four main groups. The paper defines the levels of compositional thinking development to which each criterion corresponds.
About the Authors
I. V. Alekseeva
Academy of Architecture and Arts of Southern Federal University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Alekseeva Irina V. – Doctor of pedagogical sciences, professor of Theory and Practice of Fine Arts dpt.
Address (work): 105/42 Bolshaya Sadovaya Street, Rostov-on-Don, 344006
Tel.: +7 (863) 218-40-18
T. A. Papina
Academy of Architecture and Arts of Southern Federal University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Papina Tatiana A. – Master’s degree student of Theory and Practice of Fine Arts dpt.
Address (work): 105/42 Bolshaya Sadovaya Street, Rostov-on-Don, 344006
Tel.: +7 (863) 218-40-18
S. А. Lizenko
Academy of Architecture and Arts of Southern Federal University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Lizenko Svetlana А. – Master’s degree student of Theory and Practice of Fine Arts dpt.
Address (work): 105/42 Bolshaya Sadovaya Street, Rostov-on-Don, 344006
Tel.: +7 (863) 218-40-18
References
1. Ananyev, B.G., 1972. Some problems of adult psychology. Moscow: Znaniye.
2. Druzhinin, V.N., 2005. Life options: essays on existential psychology. Moscow: PER SE.
3. Ioganson, B.V., 1959. About painting for young artists. Moscow: published by Academy of Arts of the USSR.
4. Kardovsky, D.N., 1938. On the principles and methods of teaching drawing: a drawing guide. Moscow: Leningrad: Gosstroyizdat.
5. Korobko, Yu.V., 2005. Developing purposeful perception of the pictorial qualities of color in work from life among students of art and graphic faculties. Doctoral Thesis in Pedagogical Sciences, Krasnodar.
6. Radlov, N.E., 1978. Drawing from life. 3rd ed. Leningrad: Artist of the RSFSR.
7. Rostovtsev, N.N., 1985. Educational drawing. Moscow: Prosveshcheniye.
8. Rubinshtein, S.L., 1989. The principle of creative initiative. Issues of Philosophy. No. 4: 88-95.
9. Binet, A., 1908. La psyhologie artistique de Tade Stuka. L’Annee psychologie. Vol. 15: 316-356.
10. Hoffman, D., 1998. Visual Intelligence: How We Create What We See. New York: W.W. Norton.
Review
For citations:
Alekseeva I.V., Papina T.A., Lizenko S.А. Criteria for development levels of students’ compositional thinking when solving educational and creative problems during painting classes. The world of academia: culture, education. 2024;(4):20-26. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18522/2658-6983-2024-4-20-26
Views:
7
Email this article 